which term is defined as “a legal doctrine that permitted racial segregation in public facilities?”
Which term is defined as a legal doctrine that permits racial segregation in public facilities? – Separate but equal was a legal doctrine that permitted racial segregation. The government allowed for the separation of services, facilities, accommodations, housing, medical care, education, employment, and transportation along racial lines as long as the quality of the services and facilities were equal.
What term is used to describe segregation that is expressed in the law? – The Law of Segregation states that the two alleles of a given gene will be separate from one another during gamete formation (meiosis). law of independent assortment.
Which of the following was a direct result of the decision in Brown v Board of Education quizlet? – Which of the following was a direct result of the decision in Brown v. Board of Education? The process of desegregation began in all public schools throughout the country.
How did Regents v Bakke change affirmative action policies quizlet? – How did Regents v. Bakke change affirmative action policies? It struck down the use of strict racial quotas. It ruled race could not be factored into admissions.
What is de facto and de jure segregation? – Judicial rulings and legislation passed during the era of the Civil Rights Movement ended de jure segregation, separation that was mandated by law and enforced by the government. But de facto segregation — separation that exists even though laws do not require it — persists to the present day.
What is the law of segregation quizlet? – Mendel’s Law of Segregation. Mendel’s law of segregation states that the pair of alleles that each parent carries separate during the formation of gametes. Therefore, every parent donates one allele for each trait and the alleles from each parent unite randomly during fertilization.
Why was the Brown v Board of Education Important quizlet? – It was seen as a major civil rights victory because segregation in education was now unconstitutional.
Which of the following is true of Brown v Board of Education 1954 quizlet? – Which of the following is true of Brown v. Board of Education (1954)? The justices outlawed de jure segregation.
What was the direct result of Brown v Board of Education? – Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka was a landmark 1954 Supreme Court case in which the justices ruled unanimously that racial segregation of children in public schools was unconstitutional.
How did Regents versus Bakke change affirmative action policies Brainly? – How did Regents v. Bakke change affirmative action policies? It struck down the use of strict racial quotas.
What did the Supreme Court’s decision in Regents of the University of California v Bakke do quizlet? – In Regents of University of California v. Bakke , the Supreme Court ruled that a university’s use of racial quotas in its admissions process was unlawful, but a school’s use of “affirmative action” to accept more outvoted candidates was constitutional in some circumstances. You just studied 8 terms!
What are the establishment clause and the free exercise clause quizlet? – The establishment clause stops the government from favoring a religion and the free exercise clause stops people from expressing their religious beliefs. The establishment clause allows the government to favor a religion and the free exercise clause stops people from being able to express their beliefs.