19. On June 30, 2016, Mobley C
19. On June 30, 2016, Mobley Corporation acquired a patent for$4.10 million. The patent was estimated to have an eight-year lifeand no residual value. Mobley uses the straight-line method ofamortization for intangible assets. At the beginning of January2018, Mobley successfully defended its patent against infringement.Litigation costs totaled $660,000.
Required: 1. Calculate patent amortization for 2016 and2017.
2. Prepare the journal entry to record the 2018 litigationcosts.
3. Calculate amortization for 2018.
4-a. Prepare the journal entry to record the 2018 litigationcosts and calculate amortization for 2018, assuming that Mobleyprepares its financial statements according to InternationalFinancial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
4-b. Calculate amortization for 2018 under IFRS.
Answer:
1 | Calculation of Patent Amortization under straight line method: | |||||||
Cost of the patent = $ 4100000 | ||||||||
Useful Life = 8 years | ||||||||
Residual value = Nil | ||||||||
Patent Amortization per year under straight line method | ||||||||
(Cost of the asset – Residual Life) / useful Life | ||||||||
(4100000 – 0) / 8 = $512500 | ||||||||
Particulars | $ | |||||||
Cost of the Patent as on June 30 2016 | 4100000 | |||||||
Less: Patent Amortization for the year 2016 | -256250 | |||||||
Written down Value as on Jan 1′ 2017 | 3843750 | |||||||
Less: Patent Amortization for the year 2017 | -512500 | |||||||
Written down Value as on Jan 1′ 2018 | 3331250 | |||||||
2 | Under US GAAP, legal fees and other costs incurred in successfullydefending a patent lawsuit can be capitalized only when suchsubsequent expenditure, after the asset has been acquired, wouldenable (although such costs has been incurred to establish theownership right of the asset in the lawsuit) the patent togenerate future economic benefits in excess of the originallyassessed standard of performance. Thus the legal costs incurred bythe company in the given case will be expenses and will be chargedto the Income statement as it has not generated any future benefitin excess of the originally assessed performance of the asset andhence does not meet the recognition criteria under the USGAAP. | |||||||
Therefore, the journal entry that would be passed for thelitigation cost of $ 660,000 will be: | ||||||||
Date | Account Title | Debit $ | Credit $ | |||||
LitigationExpense | 660000 | |||||||
Cash | 660000 | |||||||
3 | Since the Patent value does not change due to the litigationcost, | |||||||
the Patent Amortization for the year 2018 will be same as $512500 | ||||||||
4 | Under IFRS, the infringement litigation cost will be capitalized onthe ground that it was incurred to defend the title of the patentand therefore the ownership of the intangible asset. | |||||||
a | Particulars | $ | ||||||
Cost of the Patent as on June 30 2016 | 4100000 | |||||||
Less: depreciation for the year 2016 | -256250 | |||||||
Written down Value as on Jan 1′ 2017 | 3843750 | |||||||
Less: depreciation for the year 2017 | -512500 | |||||||
Written down Value as on Jan 1′ 2018 | 3331250 | |||||||
Add: Cost of litigation against infringement | 660000 | |||||||
Book Value as on Jan 1 2018 | 3991250 | |||||||
Less: Patent Amortization for the year 2018 | -665208 | |||||||
Note: Patent Amortization per year after 2017 | ||||||||
(Revised Cost – Residual Value)/ Remaining useful Life | ||||||||
(3991250 – 0) / 6 = $ 665208 | ||||||||
b | Journal Entry for recording litigation costs | |||||||
Date | Account Title | Debit $ | Credit $ | |||||
Patent | 665208 | |||||||
Cash | 665208 | |||||||
(being litigation cost incurred capitalized) |